<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>George&#039;s Technology Blog &#187; Scams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/articles/scams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog</link>
	<description>» Smart Phones, Web Design, Google or whatever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Spammers copycat valid emails</title>
		<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200906/scams/spammers-copycat-valid-emails/</link>
		<comments>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200906/scams/spammers-copycat-valid-emails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safer surfing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/?p=605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spammers are nothing if not smart copycats. Why write your own copy (text message) and come up with your own ideas for formatting emails when you can take ideas directly from valid emails? That exactly what I see happening more and more lately. Take this email for example: This message contains images. If you don&#8217;t]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200906/scams/spammers-copycat-valid-emails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safe to Search? When SEO Goes Bad</title>
		<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200905/scams/safe-to-search-when-seo-goes-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200905/scams/safe-to-search-when-seo-goes-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 02:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safer surfing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Free, Screensavers, 2009 Saturn, Lyrics Can you just look at keywords and see which ones are safe? Aren&#8217;t they all safe? No. And you can&#8217;t just look at a search term to decide if its safe any more than you can look at a book&#8217;s cover to see if the book will be any good ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200905/scams/safe-to-search-when-seo-goes-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Adwords Phishing Scam</title>
		<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200811/scams/google-adwords-phishing-scam/</link>
		<comments>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200811/scams/google-adwords-phishing-scam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phishing scams are an ever-present danger because for the most part they are not filtered by your computer. Luckily the email address where I received this scam is protected by Gmail&#8217;s legendary spam filters and this one never hit my inbox. There are 2 links in the email, one is valid and the other would]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200811/scams/google-adwords-phishing-scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

