<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>George&#039;s Technology Blog &#187; Computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/articles/technology/computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog</link>
	<description>» Smart Phones, Web Design, Google or whatever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:22:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Turkish Hackers Penetrate Army Servers</title>
		<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200906/technology/computers/turkish-hackers-penetrate-army-servers/</link>
		<comments>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200906/technology/computers/turkish-hackers-penetrate-army-servers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to ZDNet's U.S. Army servers breached by Turkish hackers and InformationWeek's Anti-U.S. Hackers Infiltrate Army Servers Turkish hackers penetrated US Army servers in January of this year and September 2007. The same group also hacked a site maintained by Internet Security experts Kaspersky Lab.
I understand how NASA can get hacked, though I don't know [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to ZDNet's <a href="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-307208.html " target="_blank"><em>U.S. Army servers breached by Turkish hackers</em></a> and InformationWeek's <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/government/federal/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=217700619" target="_blank"><em>Anti-U.S. Hackers Infiltrate Army Servers</em></a> Turkish hackers penetrated US Army servers in January of this year and September 2007. The same group also hacked a site maintained by Internet Security experts <a href="http://www.kaspersky.com/" target="_blank">Kaspersky Lab</a>.</p>
<p>I understand how <a href="http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200811/internet/hacking-nasa/" target="_blank">NASA can get hacked</a>, though I don't know why the government puts up with it. However when it comes to the US Army everything should be locked down tight. These sources indicate that the hack was carried out through an SQL Injection attack exploiting a vulnerability in Microsoft's SQL Server. Why would anyone use a <a href="http://www.divergentstudio.com/georgeswonderblog/2008/0918/technology/computers-and-computer-related/cray-windows-hpc-server-2008-good-humor/" target="_blank">Windows Server</a> on purpose?</p>
<p>Rant, rant, yes I rant and I should not. I just guess I sort of expect that the US Army (and other government agencies) shouldn't be getting hacked - even every 2 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200906/technology/computers/turkish-hackers-penetrate-army-servers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft DirectX Vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200905/technology/computers/microsoft-directx-vulnerability/</link>
		<comments>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200905/technology/computers/microsoft-directx-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 18:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/?p=579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bit about Microsoft Security Advisory 971778, Vulnerability in Microsoft DirectShow Could Allow Remote Code Execution (does not apply to Windows Vista, Server 2008 and Windows 7).
According to what I've read there is a vulnerability being exploited in Microsoft DirectX's DirectShow in the form of a specially crafted Quicktime Movie. I don't suspect any foul [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit about Microsoft Security Advisory 971778, <strong>Vulnerability in Microsoft DirectShow</strong> Could Allow Remote Code Execution (does not apply to Windows Vista, Server 2008 and Windows 7).</p>
<p>According to what I've read there is a vulnerability being exploited in Microsoft DirectX's DirectShow in the form of a specially crafted <strong>Quicktime</strong> Movie. I don't suspect any foul play on Microsoft's part, but I find it very interesting that the vulnerability affects a Microsoft competitor, and that the fix is to disable movie playback on that competitor's video product.</p>
<p><strong>READ</strong>: <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/971778.mspx" target="_blank">Microsoft Security Advisory 971778</a><br />
<strong>FIX</strong>: <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971778" target="_blank">KB Article 971778</a> - has a Microsoft Fix it button to do the leg work for you<br />
<strong>READ MORE</strong>: ZDNet's Article on <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=3465&amp;tag=nl.e539" target="_blank">Dangerous Microsoft DirectX vulnerability under attack</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200905/technology/computers/microsoft-directx-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Sync Improved for Cell Phone</title>
		<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200902/technology/computers/google-sync-improved-for-cell-phone/</link>
		<comments>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200902/technology/computers/google-sync-improved-for-cell-phone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google's announced that their beta version of Google Sync to help organize your address book, calendar, and just basically all of your digital and non-digital contact info with your iPhone &#38; Gmail.
This is some of the most important things I took away from that post:


iPhone users: Google Sync will remove all existing contacts and calendar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google's announced that their <a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/sync-your-contacts-and-calendar-with.html" target="_blank">beta version of Google Sync to help organize</a> your address book, calendar, and just basically all of your digital and non-digital contact info with your iPhone &amp; Gmail.</p>
<p>This is some of the most important things I took away from that post:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold;">iPhone users:</span> Google Sync will remove all existing contacts and calendar events from your phone, so make sure to back up (PC instructions, Mac instructions) your data before you set it up.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Remove contacts that you don't want to sync to your phone. From the "My Contacts" section of the contact manager, select the contact you want to remove, click "Groups" and then "Remove from My Contacts."</li>
<li>Merge duplicates so friend@theirgmailaddress.com and samefriend@theirworkaddress.com both belong to the same contact. To do so, select both contacts, and click "Merge these 2 contacts." <span style="font-weight: bold;">When you merge contacts, your address auto-complete won't work as well as before.</span> We're working on a fix for this, but until that's out you might notice addresses showing up in a suboptimal order in auto-complete, e.g. your friend's work address coming up first when you're used to emailing their Gmail address.</li>
</ul>
<p>-- <em>Google's Gmail Blog</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Get your contacts organized in Gmail and your devices, read <a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/sync-your-contacts-and-calendar-with.html" target="_blank">Sync your contacts and calendar with your phone</a> now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200902/technology/computers/google-sync-improved-for-cell-phone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Shopping Uses Robot-Powered Warehouses</title>
		<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200901/technology/computers/online-shopping-uses-robot-powered-warehouses/</link>
		<comments>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200901/technology/computers/online-shopping-uses-robot-powered-warehouses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wired.com's Autonomous Robots Invade Retail Warehouses was a very interesting read, and the Youtube video (below) is really cool. Zappos, Staples, Walgreens and the Gap have warehouses that use robots that pull products to fulfill orders and perform other warehousing chores. In the future, all of your online shopping may have robots on the other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wired.com's</strong> <a href="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/01/retailrobots.html" target="_blank">Autonomous Robots Invade Retail Warehouses</a> was a very interesting read, and the Youtube video (below) is really cool. Zappos, Staples, Walgreens and the Gap have warehouses that use robots that pull products to fulfill orders and perform other warehousing chores. In the future, all of your online shopping may have robots on the other side helping manage the fulfillment of your order, and do it faster than conventional warehouses can now.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><em>Wired.com: Robotic Distribution</em></strong><br />
<p><a href="http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200901/technology/computers/online-shopping-uses-robot-powered-warehouses/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>
<p>The wifi-networked robots, built by <a href="http://www.kivasystems.com" target="_blank">Kiva Systems</a> of Woburn (woo-burn), MA, bring products in the warehouse to human workers. These special warehouses, more densely packed warehousing spaces incorporate interesting workstations where the orange robots bring racks containing products to be shipped. A laser points the worker to the product to be shipped, the worker picks the item up and scans it, and if its the right product the robot takes the rack away, and a light above one of 3 boxes waiting to be filled and shipped indicates where the product goes. The same light also indicates when an order is complete, and ready to be shipped.</p>
<p>Online shoe seller Zappos says their Kiva warehouse has a <strong>lower defect rate</strong>, <strong>higher productivity</strong>, plus a <strong>better safety record</strong> and <strong>quieter work environment</strong> than their traditional warehouse. You might think that working in an environment like this would require lots of training, but the system actually <strong>reduces training time</strong> for new workers.</p>
<p>These <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_robots" target="_blank">autonomous robots</a> can also rearrange warehouse stock to place faster selling items closer and moving slower selling items farther away as orders come in. I also thought it was really cool that the robots find time to check their charge level - they run a self-test, check their charge, and if necessary dock with a charging station for some extra juice.</p>
<p>The relatively small space where the workers are needs climate control and lighting, but this is not the case in the majority of the warehouse since the Kiva systems robots don't need either. This translates to a <strong>huge cost savings</strong> since most of the warehouse can remain unlit and doesn't need to be climate controlled.</p>
<p><strong>For more videos on the Kiva systems robots in action</strong>, see the "Press Videos" secion at the bottom of their <a href="http://www.kivasystems.com/video.htm" target="_blank">Resource Library's Video page</a>, or their <a href="http://www.kivasystems.com/demo/index.html" target="_blank">Demo page</a> (video automatically begins playing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200901/technology/computers/online-shopping-uses-robot-powered-warehouses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Grows Up &#8211; Ditches Macworld</title>
		<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200812/technology/computers/apple-grows-up-ditches-macworld/</link>
		<comments>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200812/technology/computers/apple-grows-up-ditches-macworld/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Apples VS PC commercials have made such a statement they've spawned copycats (see Mac VS PC parody on Youtube).  They've opened stores, the iphone is a big hit, etc etc. Recently Apple announced they wouldn't be doing Macworld any more, and the Apple community is in a small uproar (I know that makes little [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Apples VS PC commercials have made such a statement they've spawned copycats (see <a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=mac+vs+pc+parody&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=4&amp;oq=mac+vs+pc" target="_blank">Mac VS PC parody on Youtube</a>).  They've opened stores, the iphone is a big hit, etc etc. Recently Apple announced they wouldn't be doing <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2008/12/16macworld.html" target="_blank">Macworld</a> any more, and the Apple community is in a small uproar (I know that makes little sense - but you get it).</p>
<p>What, remains to be seen, is the real cause of Apple's pullout?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200812/technology/computers/apple-grows-up-ditches-macworld/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Circuit City on Hard Times and Hard on Consumers?</title>
		<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200812/technology/computers/circuit-city-on-hard-times-and-hard-on-consumers/</link>
		<comments>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200812/technology/computers/circuit-city-on-hard-times-and-hard-on-consumers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported by TG Daily just yesterday there may be more trouble at Circuit City who has filed for Chapter 11 Protection than the recession. Reportedly a Circuit City customer made a purchase online with Circuit City's "24-minute in-store pickup guarantee" and the store tried to charge their customer for "System optimization and installed software."
You [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As reported by TG Daily just yesterday there may be more trouble at <a href="http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200811/technology/circuit-citys-bankruptcy-another-recession-casualty/" target="_blank">Circuit City who has filed for Chapter 11 Protection</a> than the recession. Reportedly a Circuit City customer made a purchase online with Circuit City's "24-minute in-store pickup guarantee" and the store tried to charge their customer for "System optimization and installed software."</p>
<p>You should read the whole story since it is very interesting (just click the link below the quote). Its bothersome that a store the size of Circuit City would be pulling stuff like this. Here's an interesting chunk from that very article:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>After the credit card was scanned and the receipt was printed, the consumer was getting ready to sign it. He noticed it was about $184 more than expected ... When asked "Why the extra expense?" the new clerk ... asked the consumer if the original clerk had explained the additional charges incurred due to Circuit City pre-optimizing the notebook? The consumer said, "I didn't order or want the optimization." She continued to explain that it had already been installed. As such, he was required to pay the full amount of the installation if he wanted the purchase ... At this point the notebook order had already been placed online and held with a credit card for the advertised amount of $549. These were new charges showing up at the store.</em></p>
<p>- TG Daily (<a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/40397/113/" target="_blank">More shady dealings at Circuit City, this time on Black Friday</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe there is more to Circuit City's financial woes than just a faltering economy? Maybe there are some base issues with training or basic honesty. It seems, as TG Daily's post mentions that the optimization and installation of software is a Circuit City policy. If that's the case it should certainly be disclosed at time of purchase online, or even better, since stock is being checked while the customer hits the Circuit City website the price should have been adjusted online - in bold, red print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200812/technology/computers/circuit-city-on-hard-times-and-hard-on-consumers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPU Maker AMD Cuts Jobs again</title>
		<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200811/technology/computers/amd-slashes-jobs-agai/</link>
		<comments>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200811/technology/computers/amd-slashes-jobs-agai/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to AMD slashes 500 more jobs this is the second time this year CPU maker AMD has reduced its work force. As recently as early October AMD had spun off its fabrication facilities birthing The Foundry Company in an effort to save money and generate an influx of cash. As it turns out, The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10083313-92.html" target="_blank">AMD slashes 500 more jobs</a> this is the second time this year CPU maker AMD has reduced its work force. As recently as early October <a href="http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200810/technology/amd-splits-the-foundry-company-is-born/" target="_blank">AMD had spun off its fabrication facilities</a> birthing The Foundry Company in an effort to save money and generate an influx of cash. As it turns out, The newly formed Foundry Company is the only department in AMD that will not suffer from this latest round of layoffs.</p>
<p>READ MORE:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10083313-92.html" target="_blank">CNET News</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200811/technology/computers/amd-slashes-jobs-agai/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disk Defrag for Windows &#8211; Auslogics Disk Defrag</title>
		<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200811/technology/computers/disk-defrag-for-windows-auslogics-disk-defrag/</link>
		<comments>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200811/technology/computers/disk-defrag-for-windows-auslogics-disk-defrag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Written for Windows NT/2000/XP/2003 Server/Vista/2008 Server and FREE I find Auslogics Disk Defrag 1.5.19.330 is a great addition to Windows Disk Defrag, which I'm told is not the best. The only thing I don't like (I have v 1.4) are the integrated advertisements for Auslogics BoostSpeed 4 for $29.95.
Auslogics Disk Defrag 1.4 lets me set [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Written for Windows NT/2000/XP/2003 Server/Vista/2008 Server and FREE I find <a href="http://www.download.com/Auslogics-Disk-Defrag/3000-2094_4-10567503.html" target="_blank">Auslogics Disk Defrag</a> 1.5.19.330 is a great addition to Windows Disk Defrag, which I'm told is not the best. The only thing I don't like (I have v 1.4) are the integrated advertisements for Auslogics BoostSpeed 4 for $29.95.</p>
<p>Auslogics Disk Defrag 1.4 lets me set up whether or not to remove temporary files first, whether or not to display removalbe drives (USB drives etc) and I can select the level of CPU usage (Low, Normal, High Highest) which allows me to set faster ro slower speed depending upon whether or not I'll be using the computer while defragging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200811/technology/computers/disk-defrag-for-windows-auslogics-disk-defrag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Windows Vista, Windows Mojave and Windows 7 One And The Same?</title>
		<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200810/technology/computers/are-windows-vista-windows-mojave-and-windows-7-one-and-the-same/</link>
		<comments>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200810/technology/computers/are-windows-vista-windows-mojave-and-windows-7-one-and-the-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are Windows Vista, Windows Mojave and Windows 7 all the same thing?
I've looked at Windows 7 M1 Ultimate Edition screenshots on Feast Your Eyes on the Leaked Screenshots of Windows 7 M1 Ultimate Edition!, watched the Mojave Experiment (youtube) Video below and I own Vista. Now if you haven't watched the Mojave Experiment video or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are Windows Vista, Windows Mojave and Windows 7 all the same thing?</p>
<p>I've looked at Windows 7 M1 Ultimate Edition screenshots on <a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/Feast-Your-Eyes-on-the-Leaked-Screenshots-of-Windows-7-M1-Ultimate-Edition-77163.shtml" target="_blank">Feast Your Eyes on the Leaked Screenshots of Windows 7 M1 Ultimate Edition!</a>, watched the Mojave Experiment (youtube) Video below and I own Vista. Now if you haven't watched the <a href="http://www.mojaveexperiment.com" target="_blank">Mojave Experiment</a> video or visited the site, its a promotional gimmick to sell people on Vista. So, Mojave IS Vista. Now, is Windows 7 also Vista? Looking at the Windows 7 screenshots tonight I had to wonder if Windows 7 is Windows Vista with some security updates... no really, check out the screenshots and you'll see is all very Vista-like.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><em>Quote from WindowsMojaveExperiment.com</em></strong></p>
<p><span class="red">Fact: </span>PCs running Windows Vista in 2007 were 60% less likely to be infected by malware than those running Windows XP SP2.</p></blockquote>
<p>I had to wonder if Vista was <em>60% less likely</em> to be infected by malware because it was <em>60% less likely </em>to be installed?</p>
<p>I also read that Windows 7 might be out earlier than projected (<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1654&amp;tag=nl.e539" target="_blank">New signs point to Windows 7 debuting earlier than expected</a>) and I wondered if Microsoft had finally gotten the idea to say its next version will be out much later than they really expect, thus giving them time to work out the inevitable snags? Also, wouldn't Microsoft be on schedule if they did some fine-tuning of Vista rather than a major overhaul?</p>
<p><strong>THE WINDOWS MOJAVE EXPERIMENT</strong></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="350" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/igSlM3tl2zE" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/igSlM3tl2zE"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200810/technology/computers/are-windows-vista-windows-mojave-and-windows-7-one-and-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McAfee, Norton not Number 1</title>
		<link>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200810/technology/computers/mcafee-norton-not-number-1/</link>
		<comments>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200810/technology/computers/mcafee-norton-not-number-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DISCLAIMER: I am not some high-speed, professional computer consultant and am only providing information I've read about anti virus programs. I am making no recomendations here, just reporting what I've read. I am saying that although Symantec's Norton AV and McAfee Virus Scan are on millions of computers the world over - they are not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="border: 1px dashed #000;padding:10px;margin:10px;"><strong>DISCLAIMER</strong>: I am not some high-speed, professional computer consultant and am only providing information I've read about anti virus programs. I am making no recomendations here, just reporting what I've read. I am saying that although Symantec's Norton AV and McAfee Virus Scan are on millions of computers the world over - they are not the #1 programs available according to cited source and an IT dude I know.</div>
<p>As long as I've been using Anti Virus solutions on my computers I've been using McAfee. I thought McAfee and Norton were the top 2 anti virus programs on the market until a friend the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_technology" target="_blank">Information Technology</a> (IT) field recommended <strong>ESET's NOD32</strong> ( part of ESET Smart Security, see below). This was some time last year and I'd never heard of ESET or NOD32. He even sent me a link to an online review so I could see what the difference was and read their test results, but at the time I decided to stick with good old McAfee.</p>
<p>For about 2 weeks my computer had been crashing in an unusual manner. Right in the middle of working I'd start a program and I'd get a <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308538" target="_blank">Dr Watson Post Mortem</a> error report, then the computer would freeze up completely and I'd have to power it down. This got tiring after several crashes so I decided to a look into <a title="ESET Smart Security" href="http://www.eset.com/smartsecurity/" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-78" title="ESET Smart Security - visit site" src="http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/eset-smart-security.jpg" alt="ESET Smart Security - visit site" width="350" height="259" /></a>ESET NOD32 and scan my computer. The first thing I did was download <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/internet-security-and-firewall/avg-antivirus-8/4505-3667_7-32887573.html" target="_blank">AVG 8 Free</a> while I looked for and purchased NOD32. AVG found a Trojan Backdoor infection in one of the websites I work on which had been compromised (<em>probably via a 3rd party add-on like a forum or image gallery that should have been updated</em>). A quick call to the site owner so he could send one of his computer guys intot he server and take care of the trojan on the effected website, and close the hole and I continued cleaning my computer.</p>
<p>AVG 8 found and cleaned the trojan for me and then I installed and ran <a href="http://www.eset.com/smartsecurity/" target="_blank"><strong>ESET Smart Security</strong><em></em></a><em> (which includes NOD32)</em></p>
<p><em>Here's some a <a href="http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/" target="_blank">review on anti virus programs</a> and another <a href="http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2008/09_02" target="_blank">review of antivirus programs</a>, and there are certainly other reviews posted by companies that test and compare these products out there.</em></p>
<p><em><strong>FREE ANTI VIRUS PROGRAMS</strong>: Here are some free anti virus programs, if you cannot afford to pay for one of the antivirus programs recommended in one of the reviews above then at least make sure you have a free, up-to-date version of some AV program. Here are some I've either used or have been recommended to me. These are just ideas, do your research and decide what's best for you, I can't make any recommendations - I'm just a web designer, blogger and computer semi-geek.</em></p>
<ul>
<li><em>AVG 8 Free (Download.com + video: <a href="http://www.download.com/AVG-Anti-Virus-Free-Edition/3000-2239_4-10320142.html?tag=mncol&amp;cdlPid=10891365" target="_blank">AVG Anti-Virus Free Edition 8.0.173</a>)</em></li>
<li><em>Avast (Download.com + video: <a href="http://www.download.com/Avast-Home-Edition/3000-2239_4-10019223.html?tag=mncol&amp;cdlPid=10888427" target="_blank">Avast Home Edition 4.8.1229.80923</a>)</em></li>
<li><em>Avira Anitivir (Download.com + video:  <a href="http://www.download.com/Avira-AntiVir-Personal-Free-Antivirus/3000-2239_4-10322935.html?tag=mncol&amp;cdlPid=10877501" target="_blank">Avira AntiVir Personal - Free Antivirus 8.1.0.331</a>)</em></li>
<li><em>aSquared (Download.com: <a href="http://www.download.com/A-squared-Free/3000-2239_4-10262215.html?tag=mncol&amp;cdlPid=10851788" target="_blank">A-squared Free 3.5.0.25</a>)</em></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://imblogginghere.com/techblog/200810/technology/computers/mcafee-norton-not-number-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
